Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GLM-5
GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.9 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5 leads 52.2 to 18.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.3% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 80% for GLM-5.
- GLM-5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 28.9 | 45.9 |
| Released | 2024-10-22 | 2026-02-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3.20 |
| Results tracked | 49 | 45 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.6 (#258), GLM-5: 49.0 (#47)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 30.7% | 48.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1287 | 1461 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 72.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 72.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | 28% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1434 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 69.7% |
| SciCode | 27.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59% | — |
| CadEval | 32% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 765.62 |
Agentic & Tool Use GLM-5 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 27.7 (#90), GLM-5: 30.9 (#65)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 52.4% |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 82.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 9.8% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 73.7% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 86.8% |
| BALROG | 19.3% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,432 |
Reasoning GLM-5 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.1 (#286), GLM-5: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1451 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.15 | 145.84 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 75% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 44.7% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 28.1% | — |
| DTBench | 56.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 61 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math GLM-5 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 13.7 (#294), GLM-5: 44.8 (#66)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.3% | 80% |
| LMArena Math | 1244 | 1440 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | 16.4% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 65.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 22.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 35.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 46.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge GLM-5 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#276), GLM-5: 52.2 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38.1% | 87.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1208 | 1454 |
| MMLU-Pro | 60.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 36.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 36.3% | — |
| MMLU | 74.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.3 (#113), GLM-5: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1092 | — |
| GeoBench | 34% | — |
Multilingual GLM-5 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.2 (#213), GLM-5: 53.9 (#57)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1238 | 1430 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1229 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1262 | 1455 |
| LMArena German | 1237 | 1445 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | 1416 |
| LMArena Korean | 1172 | 1421 |
| LMArena Russian | 1253 | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | 1452 |
Instruction Following GLM-5 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 63.1 (#229), GLM-5: 75.4 (#64)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1427 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 61.9% | — |
| IFEval | 79.2% | — |
Long Context GLM-5 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#195), GLM-5: 44.6 (#58)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1261 | 1446 |
| CL-bench | — | 18.7% |
Writing & Preference GLM-5 leads
Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.9 (#228), GLM-5: 66.2 (#38)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Haiku | GLM-5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1446 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1233 | 1438 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1146 | 1601 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1456 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| WildBench | 76% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 35.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than GLM-5?
GLM-5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.9 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or GLM-5 better for coding?
GLM-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.0 versus 32.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and GLM-5 share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5 has 45.