Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Command R

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku Anthropic

29.2

Rank #315 Confirmed

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher in 6 categories and Command R in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Command R leads 28.0 to 14.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Coding: 51.4% for Claude 3.5 Haiku and 17.9% for Command R.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
ProviderAnthropicCohere
Noometry Index29.231.4
Released2024-10-222024-08-30
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked4929

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 32.9 (#265), Command R: 29.3 (#306)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%37.1%
LiveBench Coding51.4%17.9%
LMArena Coding12861169
BigCodeBench Complete59%45.2%
Aider Polyglot28%—
SciCode27.4%—
WeirdML30.7%—
CadEval32%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 28.0 (#95), Command R: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
BALROG19.3%—

Reasoning Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 17.7 (#290), Command R: 13.8 (#331)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
LiveBench Reasoning28.1%21.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts12511164
DTBench56.7%46.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis48.5%33.3%
LiveBench43.5%27.5%
CritPt0%—
LMCA—9.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index127.15—

Math Command R leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 14.7 (#300), Command R: 28.0 (#246)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
LiveBench Math35.5%19.4%
LMArena Math12441155
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
Omni-MATH22.4%—
MATH Level 546.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.3%—

Knowledge Command R leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 18.7 (#281), Command R: 31.0 (#221)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
LMArena Expert12081138
MMLU74.3%65.2%
GPQA Diamond38.1%—
MMLU-Pro60.5%—
Confabulations36.7%—
GPQA (HELM)36.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 26.8 (#117), Command R: —

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
LMArena Vision1092—
GeoBench34%—

Multilingual Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 40.0 (#218), Command R: 35.7 (#245)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
LMArena Non-English12381174
LMArena Chinese12291182
LMArena French12641162
LMArena German12371176
LMArena Japanese11751143
LMArena Korean11731163
LMArena Russian12531174
LMArena Spanish12611151

Instruction Following Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 62.9 (#234), Command R: 58.1 (#261)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
LiveBench Instruction Following61.9%55.6%
LMArena Instruction Following12411167
IFEval79.2%—

Long Context Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 38.3 (#200), Command R: 36.3 (#231)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
LMArena Longer Query12611198

Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Haiku leads

Claude 3.5 Haiku: 42.7 (#234), Command R: 38.2 (#254)

BenchmarkClaude 3.5 HaikuCommand R
LMArena Text12551187
LMArena Creative Writing12331170
LMArena Multi-Turn12651163
LiveBench Language35.4%16.7%
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1146—
WildBench76%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku better than Command R?

Command R is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku or Command R better for coding?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Haiku and Command R share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Haiku has 49 scored results on Noometry and Command R has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper