Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.