Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Qwen2.5-Max

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Qwen2.5-Max Alibaba (Qwen)

40.7

Rank #146 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 36.9 to 9.3.

Side by side

Claude 2Qwen2.5-Max
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.040.7
Released2023-07-112025-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked827

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)

BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5-Max
LiveBench Coding—64.4%
LMArena Coding—1359
HumanEval+61.6%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5-Max leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)

BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5-Max
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13132.53
LiveBench Reasoning—51.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1360
DTBench51.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—67.9%
LiveBench—62.3%

Math Qwen2.5-Max leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)

BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5-Max
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LiveBench Math—58.4%
LMArena Math—1369
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Qwen2.5-Max leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)

BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5-Max
GPQA Diamond34.7%—
Confabulations—21.8%
LMArena Expert—1337
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)

BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Non-English—1352
LMArena Chinese—1382
LMArena French—1396
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1300
LMArena Korean—1304
LMArena Russian—1353
LMArena Spanish—1377

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)

BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5-Max
LiveBench Instruction Following—75.3%
LMArena Instruction Following—1335

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)

BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Longer Query—1358

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)

BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5-Max
LMArena Text—1367
LMArena Creative Writing—1339
Short-Story Creative Writing—72.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1364
LiveBench Language—56.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen2.5-Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper