Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Google

40.8

Rank #144 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads 40.7 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 80% for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite specifications
Claude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index25.040.8
Released2023-07-112026-03-03
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$1.50
Results tracked838

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 37.8 (#188)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena WebDev—1256
SciCode—41.9%
WeirdML—52.2%
LMArena Coding—1400
ALE-Bench—797.73
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 30.2 (#79)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
DeepResearch Bench—37.3%

Reasoning Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 22.9 (#186)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
DTBench51.9%76.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13144.47
Kagi LLM Benchmark—67.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—8.2%
CritPt—1.1%
Chess Puzzles—25%
EnigmaEval—3%
Thematic Generalization—63.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1407
LMCA—35%
ForecastBench—54.4

Math Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 40.7 (#90)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%80%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—27.7%
LMArena Math—1428
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 41.9 (#104)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
GPQA Diamond34.7%81.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—8.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—8.2%
LMArena Expert—1398
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 39.4 (#60)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Vision—1240

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 52.3 (#86)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Non-English—1411
LMArena Chinese—1461
LMArena French—1424
LMArena German—1429
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1392
LMArena Russian—1420
LMArena Spanish—1421

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 72.7 (#131)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Instruction Following—1377

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 42.5 (#122)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Longer Query—1394

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: 60.9 (#94)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
LMArena Text—1416
LMArena Creative Writing—1401
LMArena Multi-Turn—1417

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper