Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #267 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads 27.0 to 16.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 63.2% for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.
  • Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifications
Claude 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.031.9
Released2023-07-112024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$5.60
Results tracked843

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
WeirdML—16%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.8%
LMArena Coding—1292
BigCodeBench Complete—55.9%
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
TheAgentCompany—5.7%
BALROG—16.2%
METR Time Horizons—35.8%

Reasoning Too close to call

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
DTBench51.9%62.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13129
LMArena Hard Prompts—1271
LMCA—13.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.8%
ForecastBench—57.5
HellaSwag—84.8%
PIQA—82.6%
WinoGrande—82.3%

Math Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%8.1%
MATH Level 511.7%63.2%
Omni-MATH—33%
LMArena Math—1283

Knowledge Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
GPQA Diamond34.7%49.1%
MMLU78.5%85.3%
TriviaQA87.5%71.9%
MMLU-Pro—63.1%
Confabulations—19.1%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
LMArena Expert—1245
ARC (AI2) Challenge—94.5%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1252
LMArena Chinese—1272
LMArena French—1280
LMArena German—1234
LMArena Japanese—1180
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1264
LMArena Spanish—1256

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
IFEval—80.6%
LMArena Instruction Following—1254

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1282

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text—1269
LMArena Creative Writing—1221
WildBench—80.2%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1272

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper