Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Qwen1.5-32B
Qwen1.5-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-32B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-32B leads 33.0 to 9.3.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 30.5 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1130 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-32B leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1155 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 30.7% |
| MMLU | 78.5% | 74.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1177 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Qwen1.5-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen1.5-32B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.