Noometry

Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct Meta

30.6

Rank #291 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads 30.6 to 16.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 41.6% for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct.
  • Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Noometry Index25.030.6
Released2023-07-112024-12-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.32
Results tracked843

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 31.0 (#290)

BenchmarkClaude 2Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
SciCode—26%
WeirdML—14.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46.9%
LiveBench Coding—36.6%
LMArena Coding—1268
BigCodeBench Complete—57.5%
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.8 (#105)

BenchmarkClaude 2Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—31.9%
BALROG—23%

Reasoning Claude 2 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.1 (#327)

BenchmarkClaude 2Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
DTBench51.9%59.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13127.33
SimpleBench—19.9%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—50.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1257
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.5%
LMCA—17.5%
ForecastBench—58.6
LiveBench—50.2%

Math Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 15.3 (#298)

BenchmarkClaude 2Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%5.1%
MATH Level 511.7%41.6%
LiveBench Math—42.2%
LMArena Math—1267

Knowledge Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#226)

BenchmarkClaude 2Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
GPQA Diamond34.7%47.4%
MMLU78.5%86.3%
Confabulations—22.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.1%
LMArena Expert—1225
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 39.9 (#220)

BenchmarkClaude 2Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1236
LMArena Chinese—1217
LMArena French—1281
LMArena German—1251
LMArena Japanese—1150
LMArena Korean—1143
LMArena Russian—1252
LMArena Spanish—1270

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.1 (#157)

BenchmarkClaude 2Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—82.7%
LMArena Instruction Following—1242

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#295)

BenchmarkClaude 2Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench—33.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1256

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.6 (#207)

BenchmarkClaude 2Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Text—1274
LMArena Creative Writing—1250
LMArena Multi-Turn—1280
LiveBench Language—39.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper