Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Qwen Turbo
Qwen Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 26.8 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Turbo in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen Turbo leads 14.5 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 56.2% for Qwen Turbo.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 26.8 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |
Math Qwen Turbo leads
Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 56.2% |
Knowledge Qwen Turbo leads
Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 41.8% |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 26.8 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Qwen Turbo share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.