Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 3 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude 2 leads 21.7 to 17.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 51.9% for Claude 2 and 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 27.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | 55.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1108 |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |
Reasoning Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | 117.04 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1109 |
Math Too close to call
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | 1.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1132 |
Knowledge Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | 34% |
| MMLU | 78.5% | 70% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1059 |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1124 |
| LMArena French | — | 1145 |
| LMArena German | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1119 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1114 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1139 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.