Model comparison

Llama 3-8B vs Qwen Max

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-8B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Max leads 30.3 to 7.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 6.1% for Llama 3-8B and 67.2% for Qwen Max.
  • Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-8B and Qwen Max specifications
Llama 3-8BQwen Max
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index25.534.7
Released2024-04-182024-04-03
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—33K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.60
Output $ / M tokens—$6.40
Results tracked3423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Max
LMArena Coding11521288
Aider Polyglot—21.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct31.9%—
BigCodeBench Complete36.9%—
HumanEval+56.7%—
MBPP+54.8%—

Reasoning Qwen Max leads

Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Max
LMArena Hard Prompts11331269
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench43.9%—
Adversarial NLI57.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.45—
ForecastBench58.6—
WinoGrande75.7%—

Math Qwen Max leads

Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Max
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%16.1%
LMArena Math11511275
MATH Level 56.1%67.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1%

Knowledge Qwen Max leads

Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Max
GPQA Diamond26.1%56.1%
LMArena Expert11131248
ARC (AI2) Challenge82.8%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA82.6%—
TriviaQA67.7%—

Multilingual Qwen Max leads

Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Max
LMArena Non-English10981263
LMArena Chinese10761254
LMArena French11591330
LMArena German11041254
LMArena Japanese9671205
LMArena Korean10041142
LMArena Russian11091274
LMArena Spanish11731290

Instruction Following Qwen Max leads

Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Max
LMArena Instruction Following11271262

Long Context Qwen Max leads

Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Max
LMArena Longer Query11281288
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Qwen Max leads

Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-8BQwen Max
LMArena Text11661282
LMArena Creative Writing11501248
LMArena Multi-Turn11521277

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-8B better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-8B or Qwen Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.0 vs 30.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-8B and Qwen Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-8B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper