Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Phi-3.5-MoE
Claude 2 has enough public results to be ranked (#342); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- Phi-3.5-MoE has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-MoE | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | — |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | 2024-08-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |
| PIQA | — | 88.6% |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 88.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 84.6% |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Phi-3.5-MoE?
Claude 2 has enough public results to be ranked (#342); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Phi-3.5-MoE share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.