Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Phi-3.5-MoE
Claude 2.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#340); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- Phi-3.5-MoE has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | — |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2024-08-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| PIQA | — | 88.6% |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 88.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 84.6% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Phi-3.5-MoE?
Claude 2.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#340); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Phi-3.5-MoE share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.