Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 33.8 to 8.7.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1318 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1315 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1272 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1255 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.