Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 36.5 to 10.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1316 |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.