Model comparison

Claude 2 vs o3

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.4 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

24.7

Rank #342 Reported

o3 OpenAI

47.4

Rank #53 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and o3 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where o3 leads 48.9 to 8.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 97.8% for o3.

Side by side

Claude 2 and o3 specifications
Claude 2o3
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index24.747.4
Released2023-07-112025-04-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$8
Results tracked863

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3: 47.3 (#57)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3
SWE-bench Verified—62.3%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—58.4%
Aider Polyglot—81.3%
GSO—8.8%
WeirdML—52.4%
LMArena Coding—1408
CadEval—74%
ALE-Bench—933.55
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3: 34.3 (#42)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—30.8%
DeepResearch Bench—45.2%
OSWorld—23%
LMArena Search—1144
METR Time Horizons—65.4%

Reasoning o3 leads

Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), o3: 32.1 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3
DTBench51.9%84.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.08146.88
ARC-AGI-2—6.5%
SimpleBench—53.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—67.6%
ARC-AGI-1—60.8%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—38%
EnigmaEval—13.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1402
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
LMCA—39.7%
ForecastBench—62.5

Math o3 leads

Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), o3: 48.9 (#49)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%84.4%
MATH Level 511.7%97.8%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—33.3%
Omni-MATH—71.4%
LMArena Math—1426
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—18.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge o3 leads

Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), o3: 54.5 (#47)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3
GPQA Diamond34.7%81.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—20.3%
SimpleQA Verified—49.4%
MMLU-Pro—85.9%
Confabulations—14.4%
GPQA (HELM)—75.3%
LMArena Expert—1403
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3: 40.7 (#35)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3
LMArena Vision—1214
GeoBench—74%
VPCT—52%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3: 51.9 (#99)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3
LMArena Non-English—1402
LMArena Chinese—1438
LMArena French—1430
LMArena German—1420
LMArena Japanese—1404
LMArena Korean—1371
LMArena Russian—1407
LMArena Spanish—1395

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3: 73.0 (#122)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3
IFEval—86.9%
LMArena Instruction Following—1368

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3: 53.2 (#6)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3
Fiction.LiveBench—88.9%
CL-bench—17.8%
LMArena Longer Query—1372

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3: 63.7 (#62)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3
LMArena Text—1410
LMArena Creative Writing—1359
Short-Story Creative Writing—83.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1676
WildBench—86.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1405

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than o3?

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.4 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and o3 share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.

Related comparisons

Go deeper