Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.7

Rank #60 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.6 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.6 leads 57.0 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 96.1% for Kimi K2.6.
  • Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Kimi K2.6 specifications
Claude 2Kimi K2.6
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
Noometry Index25.047.7
Released2023-07-112026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked851

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2.6
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1509
SciCode—53.5%
WeirdML—55.9%
LMArena Coding—1488
ALE-Bench—1,093
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2.6
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
ExploitBench—18.4%
GBAEval—0.9%
GDP.pdf—12%
Vending-Bench 2—6,205

Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2.6
DTBench51.9%90.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13151.05
NYT Connections (extended)—87.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—26%
EBR-Bench—2.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1470
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
LMCA—37.3%

Math Kimi K2.6 leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)

Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2.6
GPQA Diamond34.7%90.8%
SimpleQA Verified—34.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.8%
LMArena Expert—1491
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2.6
LMArena Vision—1283
Blueprint-Bench 2—3.9%
Furniture Assembly—21.7%
LMArena Document—1451

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2.6
LMArena Non-English—1446
LMArena Chinese—1521
LMArena French—1471
LMArena German—1450
LMArena Japanese—1443
LMArena Korean—1427
LMArena Russian—1446
LMArena Spanish—1464

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2.6
LMArena Instruction Following—1451

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2.6
LMArena Longer Query—1468

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2.6
LMArena Text—1455
LMArena Creative Writing—1434
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1725
EQ-Bench 4—1202
LMArena Multi-Turn—1453

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Kimi K2.6 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper