Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

24.7

Rank #342 Reported

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

39.6

Rank #151 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 36.4 to 8.7.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Claude 2Mistral Medium 3.5
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index24.739.6
Released2023-07-11—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked822

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena WebDev—1263
LMArena Coding—1461
HumanEval+61.6%—

Reasoning Claude 2 leads

Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.5
Epoch Capabilities Index120.08141.42
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1436
DTBench51.9%—

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
LMArena Math—1432
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.5
GPQA Diamond34.7%—
LMArena Expert—1431
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1222

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English—1405
LMArena Chinese—1443
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1453
LMArena Korean—1387
LMArena Russian—1396
LMArena Spanish—1406

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following—1414

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query—1414

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Mistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text—1421
LMArena Creative Writing—1372
EQ-Bench 4—993
LMArena Multi-Turn—1423

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper