Model comparison

Llama 2-70B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.4

Rank #349 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 40.0 to 7.4.

Side by side

Llama 2-70B and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Llama 2-70BMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index24.440.2
Released2023-07-18—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked3522

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Coding10791461
LMArena WebDev—1264

Reasoning Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10731436
Epoch Capabilities Index113.79141.35
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
DTBench41.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard64.9%—
CommonsenseQA 2.050%—
ForecastBench51.4—
HellaSwag85.3%—
LAMBADA78.9%—
PIQA82.8%—
WinoGrande80.2%—

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math10911431
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250%—
MATH Level 53.3%—
GSM8K69.6%—

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert10391432
GPQA Diamond26.3%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ88.6%—
MMLU69.9%—
OpenBookQA60.2%—
TriviaQA87.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 2-70B: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1223

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English10451404
LMArena Chinese9951442
LMArena French10901448
LMArena German10411451
LMArena Korean9641385
LMArena Russian10831395
LMArena Spanish11431409
LMArena Japanese927—

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following10711415

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query10621415

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text11151421
LMArena Creative Writing10751374
LMArena Multi-Turn10881423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-70B better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-70B or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper