Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 42.7 to 9.3.
  • Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) specifications
Claude 2Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
Noometry Index25.041.2
Released2023-07-112025-07-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.57
Output $ / M tokens—$2.30
Results tracked842

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—63.4%
Aider Polyglot—59.1%
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—42.8%
LMArena Coding—1399
ALE-Bench—597.5
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Terminal-Bench—35.7%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—59.1%
METR Time Horizons—59.2%

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13146.01
SimpleBench—26.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—64.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1384
DTBench51.9%—
ForecastBench—60.2

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
Omni-MATH—65.4%
LMArena Math—1397
MATH Level 511.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
GPQA Diamond34.7%—
MMLU-Pro—81.9%
Confabulations—20.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.9%
GPQA (HELM)—65.3%
LMArena Expert—1365
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Non-English—1372
LMArena Chinese—1415
LMArena French—1379
LMArena German—1387
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Korean—1325
LMArena Russian—1385
LMArena Spanish—1386

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
IFEval—85%
LMArena Instruction Following—1348

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—17.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1353

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Text—1380
LMArena Creative Writing—1350
Short-Story Creative Writing—85.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1666
WildBench—86.2%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1371

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper