Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Inkling-Small leads 45.1 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 90% for Inkling-Small.
  • Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Inkling-Small specifications
Claude 2Inkling-Small
ProviderAnthropicThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index25.046.5
Released2023-07-112026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked833

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Inkling-Small
LMArena WebDev—1409
SciCode—48.7%
LMArena Coding—1451
HumanEval+61.6%—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Inkling-Small
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13150.15
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1423
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
DTBench51.9%—

Math Inkling-Small leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Inkling-Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%90%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
ProofBench—6%
LMArena Math—1459
MATH Level 511.7%—

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Inkling-Small
GPQA Diamond34.7%88.5%
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%
LMArena Expert—1442
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Inkling-Small
LMArena Vision—1235

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Inkling-Small
LMArena Non-English—1402
LMArena Chinese—1465
LMArena French—1436
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Russian—1391
LMArena Spanish—1428

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Inkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following—1399

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Inkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query—1401

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Inkling-Small
LMArena Text—1414
LMArena Creative Writing—1331
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491
LMArena Multi-Turn—1418

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Inkling-Small share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper