Model comparison

Claude 2 vs o3-mini

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and o3-mini in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3-mini leads 38.3 to 16.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.7% for Claude 2 and 96.5% for o3-mini.

Side by side

Claude 2 and o3-mini specifications
Claude 2o3-mini
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.036.7
Released2023-07-112024-12-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked851

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3-mini
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
LMArena Coding—1378
CadEval—54%
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Claude 2 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3-mini
DTBench51.9%68.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13140.34
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1366
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
ForecastBench—59.6
LiveBench—75.9%

Math o3-mini leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Knowledge o3-mini leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3-mini
GPQA Diamond34.7%77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%
LMArena Expert—1364
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3-mini
LMArena Non-English—1319
LMArena Chinese—1379
LMArena French—1334
LMArena German—1303
LMArena Japanese—1286
LMArena Korean—1314
LMArena Russian—1304
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3-mini
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1337

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3-mini
Fiction.LiveBench—50%
LMArena Longer Query—1343

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2o3-mini
LMArena Text—1337
LMArena Creative Writing—1286
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1320
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than o3-mini?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and o3-mini share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper