Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 30.8 to 9.3.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | 17.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1034 |
| MBPP+ | — | 23.3% |
Reasoning Claude 2 leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1005 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1047 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 970 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1012 |
| LMArena German | — | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 990 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 992 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1003 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 959 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.