Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads 30.8 to 10.2.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 29.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1034 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 23.3% |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1005 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1047 |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 970 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1012 |
| LMArena German | — | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 990 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 992 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1003 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 959 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.