Model comparison

Claude 2 vs Claude Opus 4.1

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2 Anthropic

25.0

Rank #346 Reported

Claude Opus 4.1 Anthropic

41.0

Rank #142 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Opus 4.1 in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Opus 4.1 leads 42.0 to 16.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 2.5% for Claude 2 and 68.9% for Claude Opus 4.1.

Side by side

Claude 2 and Claude Opus 4.1 specifications
Claude 2Claude Opus 4.1
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Noometry Index25.041.0
Released2023-07-112025-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—32K
Input $ / M tokens—$15
Output $ / M tokens—$75
Results tracked848

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Claude Opus 4.1
SWE-bench Verified—73.3%
LMArena WebDev—1390
WeirdML—45.9%
LMArena Coding—1479
ALE-Bench—674.77
AlgoTune—1.34
HumanEval+61.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Claude Opus 4.1
Terminal-Bench—38%
GDPval—43.6%
Cybench—42%
DeepResearch Bench—48.3%
LMArena Search—1148
METR Time Horizons—66.8%

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Claude Opus 4.1
DTBench51.9%80%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.13144.12
SimpleBench—60%
Chess Puzzles—7%
EnigmaEval—7.2%
EBR-Bench—7.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1443
Mystery Game Puzzles—21%
LMCA—37.1%
ForecastBench—62

Math Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Claude Opus 4.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%68.9%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—12.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—2.4%
LMArena Math—1431
MATH Level 511.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—7.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.1 leads

Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Claude Opus 4.1
GPQA Diamond34.7%77.3%
Humanity's Last Exam—11.5%
Confabulations—17.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.8%
LMArena Expert—1439
MMLU78.5%—
TriviaQA87.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Claude Opus 4.1
VPCT—35%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Non-English—1405
LMArena Chinese—1427
LMArena French—1431
LMArena German—1413
LMArena Japanese—1378
LMArena Korean—1380
LMArena Russian—1422
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1435

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2: —, Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2Claude Opus 4.1
LMArena Text—1419
LMArena Creative Writing—1412
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1444

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2 better than Claude Opus 4.1?

Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Claude Opus 4.1 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Claude Opus 4.1 has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper