Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 1.0 Pro leads 32.2 to 26.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 51% for Claude 2.1 and 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 27.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.0 Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1108 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 51% | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | 117.04 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1109 |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Too close to call
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1132 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 34% |
| MMLU | 73.5% | 70% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1059 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1124 |
| LMArena French | — | 1145 |
| LMArena German | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1119 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1114 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1139 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Gemini 1.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.3 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.