Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 33.6 to 9.6.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1316 |
Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1279 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1324 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1287 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1307 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1292 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?
Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.