Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Mixtral 8x7B

Mixtral 8x7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.1 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Mixtral 8x7B leads 18.8 to 10.2.
  • Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and Mixtral 8x7B specifications
Claude 2.1Mixtral 8x7B
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index25.227.1
Released2023-11-212023-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—32K
Max output—32K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked738

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mixtral 8x7B leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mixtral 8x7B
WeirdML7.1%—
LMArena Coding—1126
HumanEval+—39.6%
MBPP+—49.7%

Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mixtral 8x7B
DTBench51%49.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27118.47
ForecastBench54.256.3
LMArena Hard Prompts—1115
Adversarial NLI—55.2%
HellaSwag—86.7%
PIQA—83.6%
WinoGrande—77.2%

Math Mixtral 8x7B leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mixtral 8x7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%—
Omni-MATH—10.5%
LMArena Math—1147
MATH Level 5—10%
GSM8K—74.4%

Knowledge Claude 2.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mixtral 8x7B
GPQA Diamond33%30.6%
MMLU73.5%70.6%
MMLU-Pro—33.5%
GPQA (HELM)—29.6%
LMArena Expert—1088
ARC (AI2) Challenge—87.3%
OpenBookQA—85.8%
TriviaQA—82.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Non-English—1077
LMArena Chinese—1055
LMArena French—1166
LMArena German—1114
LMArena Japanese—931
LMArena Korean—968
LMArena Russian—1090
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mixtral 8x7B
IFEval—57.5%
LMArena Instruction Following—1109

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Longer Query—1103

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Mixtral 8x7B
LMArena Text—1132
LMArena Creative Writing—1109
WildBench—67.3%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1115

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Mixtral 8x7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.1 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

Mixtral 8x7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.8 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Mixtral 8x7B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper