Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Llama 2-34B
Claude 2.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#345); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Llama 2-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | — |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | 105.2 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 44.1% |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 76.7% |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 42.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Llama 2-34B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama 2-34B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 73.5% | 62.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 54.5% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 84.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Llama 2-34B?
Claude 2.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#345); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Llama 2-34B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-34B has 10.