Model comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Llama 2-34B

GPT-4o mini has enough public results to be ranked (#343); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4o mini OpenAI

25.5

Rank #343 Confirmed

Llama 2-34B Meta

—

Unranked

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both.

Side by side

GPT-4o mini and Llama 2-34B specifications
GPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index25.5—
Released2024-07-182023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked6010

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 22.0 (#335), Llama 2-34B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
Aider Polyglot3.6%—
WeirdML11.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%—
LiveBench Coding43.1%—
LMArena Coding1290—
BigCodeBench Complete57.4%—
HumanEval+83.5%—
MBPP+72.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 27.5 (#101), Llama 2-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
BALROG17.4%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 8.7 (#347), Llama 2-34B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
Epoch Capabilities Index126.56105.2
PIQA88.7%81.9%
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench10.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning32.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1267—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench54.4%—
LiveBench Data Analysis50%—
LMCA10.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard—44.1%
LiveBench41.3%—
WinoGrande—76.7%

Math Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 10.4 (#314), Llama 2-34B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
GSM8K91.3%42.2%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.9%—
Omni-MATH28%—
LiveBench Math36.3%—
LMArena Math1267—
MATH Level 552.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 17.7 (#284), Llama 2-34B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
BoolQ88.7%83.7%
MMLU81.8%62.6%
GPQA Diamond37.7%—
SimpleQA Verified8.3%—
MMLU-Pro60.3%—
Confabulations37.2%—
GPQA (HELM)36.8%—
LMArena Expert1235—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—54.5%
OpenBookQA—58.2%
TriviaQA—84.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 25.9 (#122), Llama 2-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
LMArena Vision1066—
Video-MME64.8%—
GeoBench64%—
VPCT34%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 42.0 (#199), Llama 2-34B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
LMArena Non-English1266—
LMArena Chinese1265—
LMArena French1297—
LMArena German1272—
LMArena Japanese1216—
LMArena Korean1195—
LMArena Russian1275—
LMArena Spanish1276—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 61.9 (#239), Llama 2-34B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
LiveBench Instruction Following56.8%—
IFEval78.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1258—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 39.1 (#186), Llama 2-34B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
LMArena Longer Query1289—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4o mini: 39.5 (#248), Llama 2-34B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4o miniLlama 2-34B
LMArena Text1286—
LMArena Creative Writing1268—
Short-Story Creative Writing67.2%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing873—
WildBench79.1%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1285—
LiveBench Language28.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4o mini better than Llama 2-34B?

GPT-4o mini has enough public results to be ranked (#343); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4o mini and Llama 2-34B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4o mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-34B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper