Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4 Flash in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 60.3 to 10.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 94.4% for DeepSeek V4 Flash.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash specifications
Claude 2.1DeepSeek V4 Flash
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Noometry Index25.253.6
Released2023-11-212026-04-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—393K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked741

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1DeepSeek V4 Flash
WeirdML7.1%63%
FrontierCode—18.8%
LMArena WebDev—1582
SciCode—49.9%
LMArena Coding—1457
ALE-Bench—1,306

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1DeepSeek V4 Flash
DTBench51%90.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27154.49
ARC-AGI-2—61.4%
SimpleBench—61.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—52.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
ARC-AGI-1—89%
CritPt—16.6%
Chess Puzzles—33%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1444
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
LMCA—41.7%
ForecastBench54.2—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1DeepSeek V4 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%94.4%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4—24.4%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—76.5%
ProofBench—56%
LMArena Math—1427

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1DeepSeek V4 Flash
GPQA Diamond33%91%
SimpleQA Verified—33.6%
LMArena Expert—1441
MMLU73.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1DeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1420
LMArena Chinese—1468
LMArena French—1439
LMArena German—1418
LMArena Japanese—1406
LMArena Korean—1384
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1436

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1DeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1421

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1DeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1434

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1DeepSeek V4 Flash
LMArena Text—1432
LMArena Creative Writing—1403
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1559
LMArena Multi-Turn—1449

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than DeepSeek V4 Flash?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or DeepSeek V4 Flash better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and DeepSeek V4 Flash share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper