Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Codellama 70b Instruct
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 37.0 to 25.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Codellama 70b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 33.3 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codellama 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 40.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 49.6% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 65.9% |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codellama 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1052 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Codellama 70b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codellama 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Codellama 70b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codellama 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codellama 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 992 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codellama 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1024 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codellama 70b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1057 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Codellama 70b Instruct?
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Codellama 70b Instruct better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Codellama 70b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Codellama 70b Instruct has 7.