Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b vs Wizardlm 13b
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 8b scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads 36.1 to 27.1.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 34.9 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.8 (#252), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1160 | 1035 |
Reasoning C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 22.4 (#197), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1156 | 1018 |
Math C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.3 (#203), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1168 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.6 (#201), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1153 | — |
Multilingual C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#242), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1180 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1181 | 1023 |
| LMArena German | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1120 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1197 | — |
Instruction Following C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 60.1 (#253), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1155 | 1048 |
Long Context C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#236), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1191 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 39.0 (#250), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1185 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1168 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b better than Wizardlm 13b?
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 8b and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 8b has 15 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.