Model comparison
Magistral Medium vs Wizardlm 13b
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.3 to 30.5.
Side by side
| Magistral Medium | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.2 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-03-17 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $5 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1035 |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1267 | 1018 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 16.2% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 6.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
Math Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1250 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
Multilingual Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1232 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1227 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1267 | — |
| LMArena German | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1271 | — |
Instruction Following Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1254 | 1048 |
Long Context Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1295 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Magistral Medium leads
Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Magistral Medium | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1255 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1245 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Medium better than Wizardlm 13b?
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Magistral Medium or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.