Model comparison

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 34.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b Cohere

34.9

Rank #229 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 8b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.1 to 39.0.

Side by side

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
C4ai Aya Expanse 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderCohereXiaomi
Noometry Index34.948.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1519

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.8 (#252), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding11601504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 22.4 (#197), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts11561482
CritPt—12%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.3 (#203), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math11681468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.6 (#201), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert11531501
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#242), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English11801434
LMArena Chinese11811511
LMArena Russian11971409
LMArena French—1475
LMArena German1188—
LMArena Japanese1120—
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 60.1 (#253), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following11551463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#236), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query11911463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 39.0 (#250), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkC4ai Aya Expanse 8bMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text11851455
LMArena Creative Writing11681400
LMArena Multi-Turn11601451

Frequently asked questions

Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 34.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 8b and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 8b has 15 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper