Model comparison

Magistral Medium vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Medium scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 8.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 39.2% for Magistral Medium and 51.3% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Magistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderMistral AIXiaomi
Noometry Index35.248.5
Released2025-03-172026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K1.05M
Max output16K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$5$0.28
Results tracked2219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Flash
SciCode39.2%51.3%
LMArena Coding13191504
LMArena WebDev—1637

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Flash
CritPt0.3%12%
LMArena Hard Prompts12671482
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark16.2%—
ARC-AGI-16.1%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math12501468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert12231501

Multimodal Not comparable

Magistral Medium: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English12321434
LMArena Chinese12271511
LMArena French12671475
LMArena Russian12241409
LMArena Spanish12711456
LMArena German1248—
LMArena Japanese1175—
LMArena Korean1125—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12541463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query12951463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral MediumMiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text12551455
LMArena Creative Writing12451400
LMArena Multi-Turn12751451

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Medium better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Medium has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper