Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Claude 2
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 34.0 to 9.3.
- C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Claude 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 25.0 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | 2023-07-11 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), Claude 2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Claude 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), Claude 2: 21.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Claude 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | — |
| DTBench | — | 51.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 120.13 |
Math C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), Claude 2: 9.3 (#320)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Claude 2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1200 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.7% |
Knowledge C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), Claude 2: 16.9 (#287)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Claude 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | — |
| MMLU | — | 78.5% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), Claude 2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Claude 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | — |
| LMArena French | 1248 | — |
| LMArena German | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), Claude 2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Claude 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), Claude 2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Claude 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), Claude 2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Claude 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Claude 2?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Claude 2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Claude 2 has 8.