Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 32.0 to 8.7.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1223 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1204 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1230 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1167 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1179 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1186 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1201 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.