Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Pro vs QwQ-32B

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Pro Amazon

31.0

Rank #281 Confirmed

QwQ-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.8

Rank #159 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 38.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 32.6% for Amazon Nova Pro and 83.5% for QwQ-32B.
  • QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.039.8
Released2024-12-032024-11-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window300K—
Max output10K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.80—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked3836

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
LiveBench Coding38.1%72.2%
LMArena Coding12701333
Aider Polyglot—20.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct—44.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), QwQ-32B: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25%—
TheAgentCompany1.7%—

Reasoning QwQ-32B leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
LiveBench Reasoning32.6%83.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts12461325
LiveBench Data Analysis48.3%65%
Epoch Capabilities Index123.8137.6
LiveBench43.5%72%
Chess Puzzles—5%
ForecastBench—58.3

Math QwQ-32B leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
LiveBench Math38%77.8%
LMArena Math12521359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—59.2%
Omni-MATH24.2%—

Knowledge QwQ-32B leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
Confabulations30.1%15.6%
LMArena Expert12111324
GPQA Diamond—65.3%
Humanity's Last Exam4.4%—
MMLU-Pro67.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
GPQA (HELM)44.6%—
MMLU82%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), QwQ-32B: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
LMArena Vision980—

Multilingual QwQ-32B leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
LMArena Non-English12341305
LMArena Chinese12441378
LMArena French12711336
LMArena German12431313
LMArena Japanese12001262
LMArena Korean12031279
LMArena Russian12401297
LMArena Spanish11821354

Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
LiveBench Instruction Following67.1%81.8%
LMArena Instruction Following12351297
IFEval81.5%—

Long Context QwQ-32B leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
LMArena Longer Query12551308
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwQ-32B
LMArena Text12591329
LMArena Creative Writing12121288
Short-Story Creative Writing60.5%80.2%
LMArena Multi-Turn12461314
LiveBench Language37%51.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1257
WildBench77.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Pro or QwQ-32B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.1 vs 35.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and QwQ-32B share?

27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper