Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen3-1.7B
Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 28.5 to 16.3.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-1.7B leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | 28.4% |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena French | 1271 | — |
| LMArena German | 1243 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen3-1.7B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.