Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen Turbo
Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Amazon Nova Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 28.5 to 15.3.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | 1M |
| Max output | 10K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena French | 1271 | — |
| LMArena German | 1243 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen Turbo?
Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Amazon Nova Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.