Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multimodal, where Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads 33.5 to 25.0.
- Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
- Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | 131K |
| Max output | 10K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena French | 1271 | — |
| LMArena German | 1243 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.