Model comparison

Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Pro Amazon

31.0

Rank #281 Confirmed

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.8

Rank #322 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 43.9 to 23.8.
  • Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen1.5 4b Chat specifications
Amazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.028.8
Released2024-12-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window300K—
Max output10K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.80—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked3813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Coding1270999
LiveBench Coding38.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25%—
TheAgentCompany1.7%—

Reasoning Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts1246976
LiveBench Reasoning32.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.8—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Math12521026
Omni-MATH24.2%—
LiveBench Math38%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Expert1211980
Humanity's Last Exam4.4%—
MMLU-Pro67.3%—
Confabulations30.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
GPQA (HELM)44.6%—
MMLU82%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Vision980—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Non-English1234979
LMArena Chinese12441024
LMArena German1243902
LMArena Russian1240952
LMArena French1271—
LMArena Japanese1200—
LMArena Korean1203—
LMArena Spanish1182—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Instruction Following1235978
LiveBench Instruction Following67.1%—
IFEval81.5%—

Long Context Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Longer Query1255988

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Text1259997
LMArena Creative Writing1212969
LMArena Multi-Turn1246977
Short-Story Creative Writing60.5%—
WildBench77.7%—
LiveBench Language37%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

Amazon Nova Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper