Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Llama 3-70B
Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-70B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 28.5 to 12.8.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |
Agentic & Tool Use Llama 3-70B leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
| Cybench | — | 5% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1195 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 122.93 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |
Math Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1149 |
| MMLU | 82% | 79.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Llama 3-70B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1232 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1241 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1194 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1174 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1223 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Llama 3-70B?
Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Llama 3-70B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (35.1 vs 35.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Llama 3-70B share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.