Model comparison

Amazon Nova Pro vs Mercury 2.5

Amazon Nova Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#278); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Pro Amazon

30.5

Rank #278 Confirmed

Mercury 2.5 Inception

30.2

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 26.4 to 22.4.
  • Mercury 2.5 is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
  • Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 260K.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Pro and Mercury 2.5 specifications
Amazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
ProviderAmazonInception
Noometry Index30.530.2
Released2024-12-032026-09-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window300K260K
Max output10K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.80$0.04
Output $ / M tokens$3.20$0.15
Results tracked382

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 34.6 (#224), Mercury 2.5: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LiveBench Coding38.1%—
LMArena Coding1270—
ALE-Bench—301.65

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 16.6 (#139), Mercury 2.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25%—
TheAgentCompany1.7%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 19.2 (#240), Mercury 2.5: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LiveBench Reasoning32.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1246—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.75—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 26.4 (#240), Mercury 2.5: 22.4

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
ProofBench—3%
Omni-MATH24.2%—
LiveBench Math38%—
LMArena Math1252—

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 27.1 (#246), Mercury 2.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
Humanity's Last Exam4.4%—
MMLU-Pro67.3%—
Confabulations30.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
GPQA (HELM)44.6%—
LMArena Expert1211—
MMLU82%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 24.5 (#121), Mercury 2.5: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LMArena Vision980—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 39.9 (#218), Mercury 2.5: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LMArena Non-English1234—
LMArena Chinese1244—
LMArena French1270—
LMArena German1243—
LMArena Japanese1200—
LMArena Korean1203—
LMArena Russian1240—
LMArena Spanish1182—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 65.1 (#221), Mercury 2.5: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LiveBench Instruction Following67.1%—
IFEval81.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1235—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#199), Mercury 2.5: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LMArena Longer Query1255—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 44.1 (#221), Mercury 2.5: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProMercury 2.5
LMArena Text1259—
LMArena Creative Writing1212—
Short-Story Creative Writing60.5%—
WildBench77.7%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1245—
LiveBench Language37%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Mercury 2.5?

Amazon Nova Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#278); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Mercury 2.5?

Mercury 2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.

Which has the bigger context window?

Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 260K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Mercury 2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper