Model comparison
Amazon Nova Micro vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Amazon Nova Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Micro leads 39.5 to 23.8.
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.035 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 999 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 976 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |
Math Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1026 |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 980 |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1024 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 1238 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 978 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |
Long Context Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 988 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 977 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Amazon Nova Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Amazon Nova Micro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.5 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.