Model comparison
Amazon Nova Micro vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Amazon Nova Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Micro leads 24.9 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Omni-MATH: 21.4% for Amazon Nova Micro and 29.4% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.
- Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.17 / $0.70 for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 28.6 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Max output | 10K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.035 | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 30.0 (#289), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 21.9 (#125), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 16.7 (#289), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 24.9 (#252), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | 29.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1206 | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 29.2 (#231), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | 34.1% |
| MMLU | 70.8% | 72.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.7 (#234), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | — |
| LMArena French | 1237 | — |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 56.6 (#267), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 76% | 74.1% |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#224), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1206 | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 39.7 (#242), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 74.3% | 73.1% |
| LMArena Text | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Amazon Nova Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 7B Instruct lists at $0.17 and $0.70.
Is Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 30.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.