Model comparison

Amazon Nova Lite vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Lite Amazon

31.9

Rank #265 Confirmed

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) xAI

48.6

Rank #54 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads 52.3 to 19.3.
  • Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.24 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning).
  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Lite and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) specifications
Amazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
ProviderAmazonxAI
Noometry Index31.948.6
Released2024-12-032026-02-17
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window300K1M
Max output10K30K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.24$2.50
Results tracked3446

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 42.1 (#112)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
LMArena Coding12391459
ALE-Bench236.251,150
LMArena WebDev—1375
WeirdML—52.3%
LiveBench Coding27.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: —, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 34.4 (#46)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
Terminal-Bench—57.3%
τ²-bench Banking—18%
LMArena Search—1189
Vending-Bench 2—4,663

Reasoning Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.3 (#32)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
LMArena Hard Prompts12201451
ARC-AGI-2—65.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—75%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.4%
ARC-AGI-1—89.5%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Thematic Generalization—63.8%
LiveBench Reasoning36.7%—
DTBench—90.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis37.2%—
LMCA—38.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.98
ForecastBench—61.4
LiveBench36.4%—

Math Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 48.2 (#65)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
LMArena Math12271455
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—44.9%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—92.2%
ProofBench—14%
Omni-MATH23.3%—
LiveBench Math36.7%—

Knowledge Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.8 (#60)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
LMArena Expert12011439
GPQA Diamond—89.3%
Humanity's Last Exam3.6%—
SimpleQA Verified—30.2%
MMLU-Pro60%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.1%—
GPQA (HELM)39.7%—
MMLU77%—

Multimodal Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 33.3 (#98)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
LMArena Vision9901263
Blueprint-Bench 2—0%
LMArena Document—1416

Multilingual Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 54.5 (#40)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
LMArena Non-English12081441
LMArena Chinese12251481
LMArena French12371476
LMArena German12291465
LMArena Japanese11531449
LMArena Korean11531417
LMArena Russian12161458
LMArena Spanish12261443

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 74.8 (#83)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
LMArena Instruction Following12051420
LiveBench Instruction Following54.1%—
IFEval77.6%—

Long Context Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 45.5 (#34)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
LMArena Longer Query12341437
CL-bench—22.2%
CL-bench Life—11.9%

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 65.7 (#44)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
LMArena Text12291451
LMArena Creative Writing11971438
LMArena Multi-Turn11991456
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1574
WildBench75%—
LiveBench Language25.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 15× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)?

Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

Is Amazon Nova Lite or Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) better for coding?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) does, with 1M tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has 46.

Related comparisons

Go deeper