Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs phi-3-medium 14B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 41.6 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.2 (#81), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 28.9 (#84), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1458 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 36.6 (#108), phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1440 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 41.6 (#98), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1505 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.3 (#48), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.3 (#66), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1426 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#73), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1441 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 62.0 (#80), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.2 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.