Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 vs GLM-4.5

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.5 Z.ai (Zhipu)

42.0

Rank #122 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.5 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads 42.3 to 35.9.
  • GLM-4.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and GLM-4.5 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.5
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index44.542.0
Released—2025-07-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—98K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$2.20
Results tracked1227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 43.9 (#82), GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.5
LMArena Coding14831434
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—54.2%
WeirdML—40.6%
ALE-Bench—344.82
AlgoTune—1.52

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 30.1 (#86), GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14581429
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.9%

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 39.3 (#109), GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.5
LMArena Math14381427

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 42.3 (#97), GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.5
LMArena Expert15061433
Humanity's Last Exam—8.3%
Confabulations—11.3%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 54.0 (#50), GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.5
LMArena Non-English14341417
LMArena Chinese14631465
LMArena Russian14231414
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1407
LMArena Japanese—1415
LMArena Korean—1380
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 75.2 (#69), GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.5
LMArena Instruction Following14271404

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 44.0 (#77), GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.5
LMArena Longer Query14411412
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10: 61.8 (#84), GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10GLM-4.5
LMArena Text14481430
LMArena Creative Writing13681395
LMArena Multi-Turn14421415
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1343

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 better than GLM-4.5?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.5 to 42.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 or GLM-4.5 better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 and GLM-4.5 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5 has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper